1)     First Macs had motorola “68k” processors in the old days (until 1995 or so).  68000, 680020 030 040 etc….  This was back in the day when speed in MHz meant everything. This processor was also used for other types of computers (Amiga) that had a similar user interface.

2)     Then the introduction of “PowerPC” processors in 1996.  These were at first 32-bit processors that didn’t just push the MHz envelope, they actually changed the architecture of the microchip to make it “smarter”.  I’ll never forget the name: RISC (reduced instruction set computing).  Eventually MacOS and programs used the 64-bit architecture in 2002.

There were some growing pains with the change in processors that are paralleled with what’s going on today.  Mostly related to “bloated” software.  Imagine an program carrying the “computer language” for both types of microprocessors (68k and PowerPC) at the same time.  This was known as a “FAT binary” (get it? Bloated, fat!) Also, any software written for the old style of processor could be run on the new processor in something called “emulation mode”.  This made  it chuggy, slow, and almost unbearable.  Eventually, software makers dropped the old code instruction part, adopted the new architecture as king, and things became much skinnier, faster, and simpler.

3)     After this in 2005 apple said “holy shit, we’re going with Intel”, which was a smart move cause intel processors dominate. Now the apple processor of choice is the EXACT same thing you can buy for your PC.  The stats about speed and processor generation.  So you want to know what’s happening with processors in the Mac?  Follow the intel processor lineup for PCs.

The processor used in 2006 was the “intel Core Duo”.  Again, as in 1996, programs had to be distributed to run on both intel and non-intel platforms.  Yuck.  They have an “emulation mode” similar to the previous change in architecture, but again, slow, fat, and awful.

When evaluating the new intel lineup, architecture is king, *then* speed. Core Duo was actually a laptop processor designed for limited power consumption (in watts).  Then intel released a new lineup called “Core 2”, of which there was a “Core 2 Duo” (meaning second revision of the core, and “dual” cores on a chip). All that’s trash now. Intel’s “Core 2” is retired.  The new lineup is called the Core i series.

Core i3 – entry level

Core i5 – mid level

Core i7 – Kickass

Core i7 Extreme – “Now we’re all sons of bitches.”

The one thing that binds the “ Core i “ appears to be something called “Nehalem” architecture.  The name is native American tribe from Oregon.  The bottom line is two, four, or six cores (holy shit), newer manufacturing process, new memory controller, intregrated graphics processor package, new bus-types, and a very special type of memory called “L1,2,3 cache” in the amounts of 32KB L1 per core, 256KB L2 per core, 4-8MB L3 shared by all cores.  It’s lower power consumption,  but none-the lacking in terms of performance.

Disk Stats

$ iostat -xnct 5
tty         cpu
tin tout  us sy wt id
3   42  45  1  0 54
extended device statistics
r/s    w/s   kr/s   kw/s wait actv wsvc_t asvc_t  %w  %b device
0.4    3.8   11.6   23.5  0.0  0.0    2.1    1.1   0   0 c1d0
0.0    0.0    0.0    0.0  0.0  0.0    0.0    0.0   0   0 c0t0d0
tty         cpu
tin tout  us sy wt id
187  180  54  4  0 43
extended device statistics
r/s    w/s   kr/s   kw/s wait actv wsvc_t asvc_t  %w  %b device
0.8    6.4    5.0   80.2  0.0  0.0    0.1    1.1   0   1 c1d0
0.0    0.0    0.0    0.0  0.0  0.0    0.0    0.0   0   0 c0t0d0

tty         cpu
tin tout  us sy wt id
14  277  50  1  0 49
extended device statistics
r/s    w/s   kr/s   kw/s wait actv wsvc_t asvc_t  %w  %b device
0.0    1.4    0.0   12.8  0.0  0.0    0.1    0.3   0   0 c1d0
0.0    0.0    0.0    0.0  0.0  0.0    0.0    0.0   0   0 c0t0d0

Read the first post here: http://realworldnumbers.wordpress.com/2009/09/02/tracking-bands-on-gray-jays-in-algonquin-park/

Hi Justin,

The jays Mr. Best photographed are members of the Arowhon family group who nest south of Arowhon Pines between the Arowhon road and Joe Lake (north of the old track). There may have been 5 birds in the group but his e-mail showed only three separate birds. ROSLPORR (Red Over Standard Left, Purple Over Red Right) was a nonbreeding extra attached to the breeding pair from fall 2008 up to the 2009 breeding season and is obviously still there. YOBLYOSR (3 photos of the same bird; Yellow over dark Blue Left, Yellow Over Standard Right) is the breeding male on the Arowhon territory and he is at least 13 years old. The third bird photographed is POSLTOTR (Purple Over Standard Left, lighT blue Over lighT blue Right) although I admit it looks very much like POSLWOWR (two white bands on the right leg instead of light blue). That bird was banded as a nestling in the 2009 Arowhon nest this past May 2nd.

Mr. Best says there were 5 birds and that he has other reference photos so I am asking him by copy of this e-mail to see if he can see any other colour band combinations and, if so, if he could forward the photos. I expect there should have been at least one other bird (the old or a replacement breeding female; last spring it was GOSLKOOR, namely dark Green Over Standard Left, pinK Over Orange Right). Also, if Mr. Best was not confused by the comings and goings of 4 birds, there should be yet another combination as well to make up his reported total of 5 different birds.

Thanks for sending this report and the photos to me and I look forward to any other information and photos Mr. Best may have.

Dan

Here’s the original gallery of crops… I need to make some more.  Some may not be so clear.

The exact coordinates of our campsite were 45.589433N by 78.7138W on August 28, 2009 @ 13:28 EDT.

I wrote around and finally got ahold of Justin Peter with Algonquin park… he writes:

Thanks for your message, which was forwarded to me for reply. These jays are part of Dan Strickland’s 30+ year study of gray jays along the Highway 60 Corridor. We are always interested in their whereabouts and social organization. But I can’t tell you much about these specific birds without knowing the combination of coloured bands. Can you please send images (< 300 kB) of the bands? Were all 5 birds together or were they seen in different groups? It would help to have that information also. I’ll await information from you.

Can’t wait for the update!

Command Transmission & Verification Operations

Voyager 1 command operations consisted of the uplink of a Command Loss Timer Reset on 06/24 [DOY 175/1650z].  The spacecraft received the command.

Voyager 2 command operations consisted of the uplink of seven bracketed Command Loss Timer Resets sent on five-minute centers using 1.0 Hz steps on 06/22 [DOY 173/1442z].  The spacecraft received two of the seven commands sent.

NASA is sending retard-ese for an instruction set, and the spacecraft are still lucid enough to know they just peed their pants!

There just ain’t much you can coax from  ”grandpa” when all you got is “your timing is screwed up, please reset”, and the response is something other than “OK” 5 times out of 7.

Something else cool I noticed, is that they send in 1.0Hz steps…. probably because of the distance and speed causes an ever increasing doppler effect resulting in a “pitch” that might be too high or too low for voyager to consider intelligent signalling from earth.  hmph.  cool.

Considering 5.13% of the first five years of a $300,000 over 25 year mortgage and 5% down (real mortgage amount for $285,000 ) , the amount of interest paid in the first 3 years would have been $42,533.  The amount of principal would have been $18,223. Ouch.

FOR Year 1: Interest= $ 14486.16 Principal= $ 5766.70 Balance= $ 279233.30
FOR Year 2: Interest= $ 14183.28 Principal= $ 6069.59 Balance= $ 273163.70
FOR Year 3: Interest= $ 13864.48 Principal= $ 6388.39 Balance= $ 266775.31
FOR Year 4: Interest= $ 13528.94   Principal= $ 6723.93 Balance= $ 260051.38
FOR Year 5: Interest= $ 13175.77 Principal= $ 7077.09 Balance= $ 252974.29

If I were to bail out now of my existing home, and buy a new home of equivalent value, paying a low 2 year @ 3.59% the remaining 2 year would look like:

FOR Year 1 : Interest= $ 9467.47   Principal= $ 6713.93   Balance= $ 260061.07
FOR Years 2: Interest= $ 9222.43   Principal= $ 6958.97   Balance= $ 253102.10

Not too much difference here.  In fact, it would be more expensive by 127 dollars!!!  The reason is because the new 25-year term on a new home actually starts off after the first 3 years of the original 25-year term.

However, if we continue this new mortgage 5 years into the future, the other mortgage timeline would have been 8 years ahead (assuming a similar interest rate renewal for both):

New mortgage timeline 5 year mark:
FOR Year 5: Interest= $ 8432.35   Principal= $ 7749.05   Balance= $ 230663.90

Old mortgage timeline 8 year mark:
FOR Year 8: Interest= $ 12001.03   Principal= $ 8251.83   Balance= $ 229433.60

This means I will have been paid $1230 more on my outstanding by sticking with the original mortgage, however in this time of 8 years, I will have only paid 1348.45 per month on the new mortgage, while maintaining 1687.73 per month on the current mortgage.

This savings of 339.28 per month would mean a savings of 4071.00 in mortgage payments the first year, and 20,357.00 in mortgage payments for the 5 years that follow!  INCREDIBLE!!!

check out this amortization schedule calc at http://www.hsh.com/calc-amort.html

Pros and Cons of stepping into Another House at this Point

+ the value of a new home appreciate more quickly than the closing costs
+ more modern materials and building construction
+ no need to pay for new roof, new windows
+ more energy efficient home
+ mortgage payments lowered

Note: Solaris awk is known to be buggy. us the xpg4 version on all solaris boxes, or the “match” function wont work.

1 line of data set example:

20081210 133924638-0500 mmsrb owmmsrelay 193 46 46 Info;MMSRelayTxnLog(220/101)193:46:lc=Op ct=owmmsrelay op=MMBox_view.REQ ms=4.63 uid=114944517818131292 size=0 SrvcID=MMS AppID=”Openwave MMS Relay” AppHost=10.33.233.131 AppPort=8088 MsgID=AElADNwAEADBAC4KIe6D OrigIF=WEB RcptIF=WEB OrigAddr=”+19046219845/TYPE=PLMN” RcptAddr=”+19056219845/TYPE=PLMN” NumRcpts=1 EvTime=20081210133924 EvStatus=Success Folder=INBOX TrackID=AElADNwAEADBAC4KIe6D PeerHost=10.33.238.131 PeerPort=55476

bash-3.00$ more program.awk

/usr/xpg4/bin/awk ‘

RS = “\n”

{

where=match($0,”\+”)

if (where)

print substr ($0,where+1,11)

}’ test.txt

Alternatively

/usr/xpg4/bin/awk ‘

RS = “\n”

{

where=match($0,”\+”)

if (where)

print substr ($0,where+1,11)

}’

and

# cat test.txt | program.awk

Explanation:

/usr/xpg4/bin/awk ‘ <— calls the correct awk

RS = “\n” <—- record seperator becomes the end of line

{

where=match($0,“\+”) <—– match the first record with REGULAR EXPRESSION , in this case a plus sign.

if (where)

print substr ($0,where+1,11) <—– print out the 11 characters after the found location

}’ test.txt <—- the file name

Output:

bash-3.00$ ./awk.pl

19046219845

So it’s possible to have 100HP at with 10000lbs of Foot-Pounds torque at 60 RPM.  Then you break your engine.  Enjoy!

Thanks to the electric toolbox http://www.elec-toolbox.com/ for the graphic.

Horsepower to Torque Conversion Chart